DC-Air™ Wireless X-Ray Sensor Overview
3:27FTG's founders explain the two failure points of traditional sensors — the wire and indirect conversion — and how DC-Air's direct-conversion design was built to solve both.
Read transcript
Problem number one: the wire. Every year there are over 500 million intraoral X-rays performed, and this wire has been a hassle and a complaint from the dental community for the last 30 years.
Now, the problem with traditional sensors is, one, it has glass inside of this encapsulation, and the glass optic plate breaks easily. The second area was the image quality — it's based on what we call indirect conversion, and you get an inherently fuzzy image. Because we go from X-rays to light, light to digital imaging — that's indirect conversion of X-rays to digital imaging — then you have to use sharpening algorithms to improve the clarity of that image, and the sharpening algorithms are actually removing information.
Thirdly, the cord is the worst thing on a sensor there is, from the comfort standpoint and from the cost with the breakage. It tugs on the sensor inside the mouth, pulling it in various ways, thus causing pain. And the comfort of the patient is the most important, so we wanted to make something better for dental professionals — make it truly better. Enter our product, the DC-Air.
What's really exciting about the DC-Air wireless sensor is we cut the cord. What we offer to the market is replacing this bundle of wires with this product here. The evolution of both chip technology and battery technology have allowed us to improve the customer and patient experience and bring a really cutting-edge sensor to the marketplace.
Number one: it is the only product in the market that does not use indirect conversion. We use low-energy Bluetooth transmission, and what allows us to do that is the fact that we're using direct conversion. Number two: because it's direct conversion, it doesn't have the glass optic plate, which means that because we have a homogeneous construction inside, this product is far more robust and durable than the wired sensor. Third: direct-conversion image is inherently sharp because the photons are going directly to the pixels on the sensor. That's why our sensor has the highest MTF — modulation transfer function — of any sensor on the market, and MTF is the true measurement of image quality.
The first thing I noticed when I started looking at the DCR images versus the corded images: you could see PDLs clearly, you could see bone levels clearly, incipient decay finally wasn't an artifact — it was really what it was supposed to be. We are not talking about an incremental improvement in performance here. This is a quantum leap, the likes of which have not been seen since the transition from film to digital 30 years ago.
Patients love it because it's more comfortable. Staff love it as well because it's so easy to use. And the doctors love it because the image quality is amazing.
Questions about this video
What are the two main problems DC-Air was built to solve?
The wire and indirect conversion. Traditional sensors have a glass optic plate that breaks easily, and they convert X-rays to visible light before converting that light to a digital image — an inherently fuzzy process that manufacturers compensate for with sharpening algorithms, which remove real information from the image.
Why is a direct-conversion image sharper than one from a conventional sensor?
Photons go directly to the pixels on the sensor instead of being converted to light first, skipping the lossy intermediate step. FTG states this gives DC-Air the highest MTF (modulation transfer function, the standard measure of image sharpness) of any sensor on the market.
Is DC-Air more durable than a wired sensor?
According to FTG's founders, yes — because direct conversion eliminates the internal glass optic plate that indirect-conversion sensors rely on, DC-Air's homogeneous internal construction is described as far more robust.